Bill Clinton on Larry Craig

He gets it on tonight’s Larry King Live:

"Well, first of all, I think we ought to recognize that this is a very traumatic time for him and his family. And whatever happens or doesn’t, most of his political career was behind him. So whatever your party, we should be hoping that he and his family can work through this in a way that leaves them as whole as possible.

I think that that is more important than the politics of this. The politics of this will have to be resolved by him and the Republicans in the Senate."

Craig’s Legal Options

He has some, it seems. It remains the case that Craig stands accused of obscure code in a bathroom stall. No one is saying he exposed himself; no one is saying he spoke a word; no other person apart from a cop is involved. Levin has a point. David Bernstein has one too:

OK, so he was caught soliciting sex in a public restroom. Not so good. But compare that with behavior by other Senators that is not leading to any resignations: (1) Violating their oath to uphold the Constitution, by voting for legislation they believe to be unconstitutional, but arguing that they will let the courts sort it out. (2) Voting to delegate massive legislative power to the executive branch, so they can claim credit for the feel-good nature of vague but popular legislation, while blaming the executive for its actual implementation.

(3) Voting for legislation that neither they nor any of their staff have read in its entirety, if at all.

(4) Providing costly earmarks in legislation to campaign contributors and local interests (in violation of Congress’s constitutional duty to tax and spend only for the "general welfare").

(5) Accepting various forms of low-level graft that fly under the ethics radar, such as use of campaign donors’ vacation homes and airplanes, family vacations disguised as fact-finding trips, spouses employed at inflated salaries by friendly interest groups, etc.

(6) General demagoguery, e.g., Democratic members anytime Medicare or Social Security reform comes up, and Republican members on federalizing criminal law, the War on Terror, flagburning, etc.

I hear rumors of more outings to come. There really is a strange convergence here of the gay far-left and the anti-gay far-right. When left-wing activists are egging on cops engaged in anti-gay stings, you can see the ironies. But the Republicans deserve little pity, I’m afraid. The only answer is for the GOP to get real about the question of homosexual orientation, and get past it. If Republicans simply agreed to civil unions, and let gays serve in the military, this whole nightmare would pass. Why can’t they grow up like the British Tories on this question? You can win elections on more than bigotry, you know.

Faith and UnFaith

A lovely interview with Christian Wiman, editor of Poetry Magazine:

CW: My childhood was just saturated in religion. We went to church three times a week—twice on Sunday, and Wednesday nights. We prayed before every meal. We used to have to memorize Bible verses and say them before the meals. It was the context in which we understood every aspect of our lives, and still is for my family.

P&W: You believed in God, Jesus, and so on?

CW: It never occurred to me to doubt it until I went to college. I never met a single person who wasn’t a true believer until I was eighteen years old, at Washington and Lee University in Virginia.

P&W: Where the liberals got their claws into you…

CW: [Smiles.] It was a conservative school.

P&W: Maybe for west Texas it was liberal.

CW: Yeah. It fell away very quickly for me—the whole structure fell away like that [snaps fingers]. But the charge of it, and the absence of it, I felt, and never stopped feeling.