DOBSON AND HEWITT

They’re both on board for now. Here’s the usual Hewitt pro-Bush spin. “Jump, Mr president? How high, Mr president? How high?” Here’s Dobson’s press release:

“We welcome the president’s nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court. He pledged emphatically during his campaign to appoint judges who will interpret the law rather than create it. He also promised to select competent judges who will ‘not use the bench to write social policy.’ To this point, President Bush’s appointments to the federal bench appear to have been remarkably consistent with that stated philosophy. Based on the information known generally about Harriet Miers, and President Bush’s personal knowledge of her, we believe that she will not prove to be a lone exception.

Dobson is holding back for the hearings before he fully commits, though. Fair enough.

QUOTE OF THE DAY II

“Harriet worships the president and has called him the smartest man she’s ever known. She’s a pretty good lawyer … This president can be bamboozled by anyone he feels close to. If a person fawns on him enough, is loyal, works 25 hours a day and says you’re the smartest man I ever met, all of a sudden you’re right for the Supreme Court.” – a longtime conservative Christian associate of Harriet Miers, on Marvin Olasky‘s religious right blog.

NOW, YEE

James Yee’s book on Guantanamo, “For God And Country,” is required reading for anyone concerned about the maintenance of the rule of law in America. Yee, you may recall, was the Muslim chaplain at Gitmo, falsely charged with espionage, exonerated, and then cashiered by the military on adultery charges. See? The witnesses they cannot deny, they smear – which is why Ian Fishback has every reason to be worried right now. There is far too much at stake for the administration to allow the truth of their own policy of brutality toward detainees to be revealed. But Yee’s testimony is interesting about what the authorities, under instructions from the Pentagon, decided to condone and allow at Gitmo. We already know for a fact that one prisoner was “water-boarded” at Gitmo, we also know of at least two Koran abuse allegations upheld by internal investigation, we know that one CIA-approved technique was the smearing of fake menstrual blood, we know about the illegal use of dogs, and so on. What Yee testifies to is the fact that all this – and I’ve restricted myself here solely to those techniques conceded by the military itself (there are mounds of evidence that the abuse was far worse and far more widespread) – was directly encouraged by the commander, Major General Miller. Money quote:

Mr. Yee writes that when General Miller visited the prison, he would tell the guards sternly, “The war is on.” That remark and similar comments, Mr. Yee writes, were designed to let soldiers know they were operating in a combat environment where it was understood that rules protecting detainees were relaxed and instances of mistreatment would be overlooked.
“Soldiers know that when you are in combat there’s considerable leniency in the rules,” Mr. Yee said in an interview, “and the leaders, including General Miller, wanted to put them in that frame of mind.” He said that General Miller told him that he remained deeply angry over the loss of military friends who were killed in the attack on the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. The general, who is now assigned to duty in the Pentagon, declined through a spokesman to comment on the book.
Mr. Yee says the guards were constantly reminded of the Sept. 11 attacks by General Miller and others, and they “retaliated in whatever way they could” against the detainees. “In some cases, punishment often meant physical force,” he writes.

This kind of atmosphere, in which detainees are regarded as deserving of brutal treatment, and in which beatings were tacitly condoned, was, of course, the very atmosphere that “migrated” to Abu Ghraib and throughout the war-zone. Recall that Miller was sent to Abu Ghraib to “Gitmoize” it. But only a handful of grunts were scapegoated for a policy crafted by Rumsfeld and Bush and enforced by Miller. Miller is still ensconced in the Pentagon. Do you realy believe he has changed his ways?

FISHBACK UPDATE

Around 400 emails of support have poured in. Thank you so much. I’ve decided to post them all – or as many as I can physically copy and paste – onto the Letters Page, which has been in hiatus for a while. Give me more time to get them up. AOL is making it difficult to forward them all in bulk right away, but I’ve been able to send dozens already and I am told they are making a difference. Within a day, I should be able to forward them all. If you want to send Ian an email of support, email supportfishback@aol.com. If you need reminding why, here’s Fishback’s letter of conscience to Senator John McCain. Fishback and McCain are two critical figures of integrity who can save us from the moral nightmare that Bush and Rumsfeld have created – whether by design or incompetence. They need our help. If you’re a blogger and want to help, please advertize the email adddress.

IN MIERS’ RECORD

Ryan Lizza uncovers a beaut:

Miers’s long affiliation with the ABA will serve up lots of interesting tidbits that are unlikely to please social and legal conservatives. For instance, she apparently submitted the following report to the ABA’s House of Delegates. Here are two of the report’s recommendations: “Supports the enactment of laws and public policy which provide that sexual orientation shall not be a bar to adoption when the adoption is determined to be in the best interest of the child. …
Recommends the development and establishment of an International Criminal Court.”

How will Cheney defend that on Rush?

RAGE ON THE RIGHT: Check out the anger at RedState.org. Money quotes:

Bush thinks he has people instincts. He doesn’t. Putin?! This is pathetic. Air out of my lungs pathetic. And the thing is, I’m not even sure if the instinct about people we’d hope for is the one he’s looking for. Roe (or any other social issue) is simply not on his front burner. I’ve feared this, and now I’m convinced it’s true. In fact, I think he and Rove are intentionally not placing anti-Roe votes on the Court. Roe stands, both Miers and Roberts uphold it (although upholding restrictions) and it becomes clear we have a 7-2 Supreme Court in favor of Roe. At that point, I vote McCain or even Giuliani (although I don’t donate) and just don’t bother myself with the lost cause on the abortion issue. This is terrible.

There’s more:

Bush lied to us. Let Kos cheer. The post below should not get lost, that her name was on a list of acceptables supplied by the Democrats. Bush is a gutless, abortionist liar. I spit on him. Seriously.

And more:

I cannot believe that I ever trusted this man. I am such a fool. I cannot believe that I have been so foolish as to look past the open borders, the excessive spending, the support of moderate Senators over Conservatives, the nation building in Iraq, the twisted bankruptcy “reform,” etc.

My favorite:

could have picked a real conservative. instead, he picks a 60-year-old woman who’s never been married and has never had kids. are we really to believe that she’ll vote to overturn roe? are we to believe that this woman hasn’t had sex outside of marriage over the past several decades? and if she has, hasn’t she been counting on the right to abortion just as other career-oriented women do? bush has betrayed us. i will never again contribute to the republican party.

I wonder how long it will take James Taranto to describe these people as prominent liberals? As for Roe, it seems obvious to me why Bush-Rove don’t want to over-rule it. The last thing they want is to remove that issue from their arsenal of campaign weaponry. Roe has long been the right’s best friend in electoral politics. Why would they give it up now? You don’t think that people like Rove are actually sincere about abortion, do you?

BECAUSE HE COULD

Just when the conservative coalition was already fracturing – over Iraq, spending, immigration, Katrina – you’d think that Bush would pick a solid base-favorite for SCOTUS. That was my assumption: something to rev up the troops, divide the country into a classic culture-war left-right battle, etc. But I was wrong. For Bush, it’s all about his own power and his own decisions and his own cronies. I’m reminded of Clinton in his second term. When Bush says that his government does not practise “torture,” he is doing exactly the same as Clinton did when he said he did not have “sexual relations” with Monica Lewinsky. It all depends on what the meaning of “torture” or “sexual relations” is. Ditto with Miers. The only reason I can think of for Bush to rattle his base in this fashion is the same reason Clinton decided to push his luck with a blow-job in the Oval Office: “Because I could.” He picked Miers because he could. If he wasn’t allowed to get his favorite crony, Gonzales, he was going to go one better. This is not to say we shouldn’t give the Miers nomination a thorough and fair look. Unlike many of the Cornerites, I’m not sure yet whether she’d make a decent Justice. But, boy, does this pick remind us of who GWB is: about as arrogant a person as anyone who has ever held his office. Now the base knows how the rest of us have felt for close to five years. He had one accountability moment. He doesn’t expect another.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“Another reason for Bush not to pick … Gonzales or Miers is this: One of the Democratic talking points that is getting some traction is the Crony Talking Point — the idea that this presidency is made up of friends and friends of friends who all do business together and whose qualifications matter less than their connections to GWB. Since nobody on earth aside from Bush would actually consider Gonzales or Miers a suitable Supreme Court nominee, the appointment of either would smack precisely of the cronyism with which he is (in my view) being unfairly tarred. Bush would be giving his critics some very serious ammunition to use against him at a time when he can’t afford to do such a thing.” – John Podhoretz, National Review, September 29. “Nobody on earth” would consider Miers a suitable SCOTUS pick! Does that include every Republican senator, John?

AN UNMARRIED CAREER WOMAN

Here’s WaPo’s June profile of Harriet Miers. She is, of course, married in a meaningful sense: to the Bush clan. Her qualification is primarily personal proximity to the president:

Formerly Bush’s personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with him to the White House in 2001 as staff secretary, the person who screens all the documents that cross the president’s desk. She was promoted to deputy chief of staff before Bush named her counsel after his reelection in November.

Cronyism, anyone?

THANK GOD: The “Exodus Ministries” reference in Harriet Miers’ resume, which caused me to splutter my coffee over my laptop this morning, is not an ex-gay group. According to the Human Rights Campaign,

During the announcement, President Bush referenced Miers’ affiliation with Exodus Ministry. This is not the so called ‘ex-gay’ group, but is ‘a non-denominational Christian organization established to assist ex-offenders and their families become productive members of society by meeting both their spiritual and physical needs.’

Phew. My apologies for the sudden panic and hastily revised post.