Talk Radio’s Ideological Industrial Complex

Earlier this week, Politico reported on the business relationship between GOP think tanks and the talk radio right. David Frum makes an analogy:

Just imagine if the CBS Evening News were to accept $2 million from a pharmaceutical company, and then run news spots about the excellent benefits from taking that company's medication. Imagine if the Los Angeles Times accepted $2 million from a company promoting a natural gas pipeline, and then published editorials advocating government approval of the pipeline route. Imagine if columnists at the Financial Times accepted money to tout British bonds or German stocks.

Shocking, right? Yet for millions of Americans, conservative talk radio is a news source much more trusted than CBS or the Los Angeles Times or the Financial Times.

Wilkinson thinks this analogy fails:

More interesting than the superficial pay-to-play aspect of this story is what it reveals about the increasing integration of the conservative economy of influence. What we're seeing is a set of once disparate pieces coming together into a powerfully unified persuasion machine.

The Deficit Deals

Ezra Klein previews them:

The negotiators see deficit reduction as having three phases, connected to three forcing events. The first forcing event is the debt ceiling, and that will lead to the “downpayment” and the establishment of trigger policies that will require more deficit reduction later. That’s where we are now. The second forcing event is the December 2012 expiration of the Bush tax cuts. That’s when we’ll see the real showdown over revenues. The third forcing event will be in 2013 or 2014, and it’ll come from the deficit trigger, which will begin making automatic cuts about that time. That’s where we might see revenues unrelated to the Bush tax cuts and structural reforms to entitlements.

Profiles In Entertainment

Edith Zimmerman profiles action star Chris Evans for GQ. It quickly veers into the fast lane:

In the vast backseat, Chris was even more flirtatious than before, touching my arm and my knee. At this point, which was a…number of drinks in, it was easy to forget that it really was an interview, and I’d be lying if I said it didn’t cross my mind that something might happen (and that we’d go to the Oscars and get married and have babies forever until we died?). But there was always the question of how much of it was truly Chris Evans, and whom I should pretend to be in response.

Alyssa Rosenberg took issue with it:

Zimmerman’s piece comes on the heels of the March issue, in which GQ published Jessica Pressler’s account of spending the night with Channing Tatum, a couple of Snuggies, and a bottle of tequila. For GQ, sending out a female reporter to get tipsy and a little frisky with an otherwise indistinguishable slab of beef appears to be their stab at creating a novel and enduring journalistic form…

Shani O. Hilton defends the piece:

Maybe it’s because I’m a journalist, but I’d much rather read a story about what it’s like to try and interview a handsome, charming celebrity and spend time in fancy places and fall a little bit in love with one’s subject. In divulging the ethical roadbumps all journos in these situations are sure to face, Edith is telling us more than we would ever learn by reading what Evans’ workout routine is.

“Will This Be The End Of The VFYW Contest?” Ctd

Screen shot 2011-06-17 at 1.36.28 PM

A reader writes:

I decided to give Google’s new “Search by Image” a try and ended up being pretty underwhelmed, though quite amused, by the results. While Google correctly identified iconic, famous places such as the Duomo as seen from the Uffizi, the colorful houses on the hills of Positano and the palazzo publico of Siena, it failed miserably (and sometimes hilariously) with some less famous locales. For example, a shot from the Hotel Agave on the cliffs of Positano was deemed very similar to a photo of a large German man in a keg-throwing contest.  A pic of a flag-lined side street of Siena resulted in a photo of a leggy lingerie model.  And the beautiful buildings on the hills of Montalcino at sunset apparently look very similar to a swamp in the Everglades.

Another writes:

I actually recently tried out TinEye to try to find an image’s original source.  I figured it was a matter of time before Google harnessed this.

I also thought about the VFYW contest, but quickly realized it’s not a game killer.  First, you can run any potential image through the reverse search before choosing it for the contest.  Given the short window between image presentation and submission deadline, if it’s not finding anything on Saturday, it’s probably not going to before Tuesday, either.

Besides, an image search won’t work all that well for most images.  As humans, we have specific comparisons in mind when we search through images, a context that is lacking in reverse image searches.  Sure, the Gustavia harbor picture might work, because many other pictures exist from that vantage point that are pretty similar.  But most of the VFYW shots are unique.  We can imagine a different vantage point because we know what we are looking for.  A computer, not so much.

If anything, the reverse image search will force the contest to skip the more popular views.  The last few images have been really fun, because the clues were more subtle, and weren’t really something that reverse image search (or even browsing through google images) would help with.  That makes for a good contest, methinks.

Jokes In Context

After tweeting his support for Tracy Morgan, Louis CK explains himself:

Where you say something makes a huge difference about what you say and what it means and what you let yourself say. There's a lot of times when I let myself channel bad ideas as a way to do comedy. I think it's something that's a healthy thing to do, honestly. And I think the person who really fucked people up and hurt people with Tracy's words was whoever took it out of that Nashville club and put it on the national stage–whoever called Huffington Post or whoever started this shit, and said, "Guess what Tracy Morgan said," and announced it to the rest of the world. He wasn't trying to say it to the rest of the world.

TNC, who says thinks Louis CK's show is "borderline genius," doesn't buy this defense:

I think it's … important to understand precisely how this story came out. Kevin Rogers, a fan of Tracy Morgan's, who happens to be gay, went to Morgan's show, was offended by his act, and via Facebook, posted a write-up of what he saw. Louis CK admits that "he didn't get the context," and is upset that "people hear this shit mostly third hand." But Rogers isn't reporting third-hand. He was there, saw the context and was offended. …

I fail to see why CK is any more qualified to say what happened than the "third-hand" listeners he's inveighing against. Louis CK, himself, is a third-hand listener. The person "who fucked up" is not. The person "who fucked up" is a gay man living in a state where the government is actively trying to make it easier for gay kids to get stomped out at school.

“It Worked In Texas” Ctd

A reader writes:

There are two factors that your post seems to miss that should play into any discussion of the minimum wage data on Texas, and broader discussions of whether Texan economic policy is a success or a failure (for the record, I'm an nth generation Texan who likes this state but doesn't much care for its political leadership).

1. Texas' minimum wage is pegged to the Federal minimum wage.

This means that the reader's comparison to California, where the minimum wage is substantially higher than the Federal minimum wage (it's $8.00/hour), is pretty much irrelevant to a discussion of whether Texas is an economic policy success. California has a ton of workers making California minimum wage – it's just that all of those workers don't get folded into the BLS statistics because they're not making the Federal minimum wage. So comparative minimum wage figures are irrelevant if they don't take into account those sorts of state-by-state minimum wage variations. And if you really want to get into it, my bet would be that in purchasing power parity terms, those Texans making the Federal minimum wage are better off than the Californians making an extra $.75/hr are.

2. As another reader pointed out, any discussion of income distribution in Texas just has to account for the fact that we are the nation's preeminent border-hopping locale. Of course there's going to be a big chunk of bottom-end wage earners in Texas! We share a very permeable border with Mexico! Which is not to say anything substantive about the immigration issue – hell, I am and will remain pro-illegal immigration up to the day when we pass a near-open border policy – but it's a deeply relevant aspect of any discussion of the Texas economy with reference to distributional issues. We've got another continent's poor people bangin' around down here! (And more power to 'em! I've found the dubiously documented folks that I've spent time with to be uniformly upstanding, hardworking, honest, and kind.)

Another writes:

Yglesias has a great post about why Texas has fared so much better: housing construction!

Obviously the oil and gas industries helps, but when the construction industry is not destroyed by not building houses, everyone fares better. I work in the Massachusetts Legislature and as a strong union supporter, hearing from the trade unions who are out of work at clips of 20%, when I know sprinkler fitters who haven't worked in over a year and a half, it makes you realize what a drag that is on the state economy. Massachusetts has done better because it has a strong base in the colleges/universities/life sciences/some finance, but imagine what we could be doing if we didn't have such draconian zoning rules. Yglesias' post has a graph that shows just how few houses are being built in the Boston area. While Greater Boston is pretty much very developed under current zoning rules, Texas can just continue to sprawl like crazy.

However, I would caution saying that Texas is in such great shape because as gas prices continue their inevitable rise, two-hour commutes to and from the suburbs just won't be feasible.

Hitting Bottom And Bouncing Back

A reader shares a fascinating story. But don't try this at home:

I'm writing in response to the many readers who despair ever finding their way out of the "sunless pit" of depression. I spent the last two years of my life struggling to get up and find meaning in my day-to-day life. I was wrapped up in my own personal misery of what-ifs and recriminations, and slowly my friends drifted away. My husband hung on, but as he recently said, "You were my Eeyore." What changed? Why are things better?

Would you believe that it took a head injury for me to be knocked out of my persistent and consuming depression?

No kidding. Four weeks ago, I had a sports-related accident that caused me to land on my head. I never passed out, but I have amnesia surrounding the incident. When I woke up to consciousness, I felt happy, light, full of air and sunshine. At first I thought it was because I hadn't died when I should have. (Apparently, the first words out of the EMT's mouth were, "She should be dead.") Then I thought it was the rocking pain killers. Just a few days ago, however, I realized it was none of these things at all.

One of the side effects of the concussion was a change in my memory patterns. I can remember things from various times in my life, but how I remember them has changed. My memories used to be a movie version of the events unfolding. I would relive the entire emotional experience every time I unshelved a memory. Sad childhood story? I would relive, in bitter detail, each excruciating moment. Terrible embarrassment? I felt that sense of shame all over again. Of course, as I accessed memories, the emotional impact of them would be heightened by an overlay of regret, guilt and sometimes longing for a different time in my life. In essence, my memories were filed under their emotional impact. That meant when I felt sad, I would often be flooded with other sad memories that arose unbidden.

It was a downward spiral, particularly because the last few years have been tough. When my husband would say, "Just don't think about X … you're obsessing over it," I would say, "I can't." He thought I was saying, "I refuse to stop thinking about it," but I honestly meant "I cannot stop thinking about the bad stuff."

For whatever reason, my head injury scrambled my brain's normal way of doing business. Now when I think about memories, they're just that: memories – things that happened in the past. It's a huge, huge relief. I get up in the morning and feel able to face what comes next. I'm not living with a persistent sense of dread.

I don't know if my brain will revert back to its old ways. I pray not. I am living the life I should have been living for years, and I know it's possible to be happy. I imagine there are other ways to break out of these brain habits that don't involve falling onto one's head. I'm not a psychologist, so I have no idea what those methods might be. As odd as it sounds, I feel incredibly grateful to have had the accident. (And, no, that's not my concussion talking …)

I can't judge any single story, but this recalls the now popular-again electroconvulsive therapy. It sounds barbaric, and it once was, but it can be highly effective in breaking the mind's paralysis. My mother went through it multiple times when I was growing up. It terrified me; but it saved her. Next month I'll get to see her. She's never been brighter. And I cannot express how dark it got at times.

Poseur Alert Generator

Our name for the Arty Bollocks Generator, a site that saves you the trouble of writing artistic statements like this one:

My work explores the relationship between postmodern discourse and skateboard ethics.

With influences as diverse as Nietzsche and John Lennon, new tensions are created from both traditional and modern layers. Ever since I was a child I have been fascinated by the traditional understanding of meaning. What starts out as triumph soon becomes corroded into a dialectic of power, leaving only a sense of nihilism and the inevitability of a new understanding. As spatial forms become frozen through boundaried and critical practice, the viewer is left with a glimpse of the possibilities of our condition.

The Road To Better Biofuels

The Senate voted yesterday to kill corn ethanol subsidies. Michael Grunwald says government favoritism towards that fuel has held back more promising biofuels companies:

The company is called Solazyme, and it re-engineers algae to turn just about any kind of feedstock — sugar cane, switchgrass, crop wastes, whatever — into jet fuels, diesel fuels, and just about any kind of  oil. It’s leveraging the power of evolution—algae naturally produce oil — to create renewable low-carbon alternatives to petroleum that won’t divert so much farmland from food into energy.

These aren’t pie-in-the-sky ideas that might work someday; Solazyme is already starting to sell fuel to the Navy. It’s also making oils for nutritional supplements, skin creams, chemicals and other products. Today I got to eat chocolate ice cream made out of algae, with one third the fat and one tenth the cholesterol of regular chocolate ice cream. It tasted like chocolate ice cream.