The Guy Who Actually Saw It, Ctd

A reader writes:

I’m surprised that you of all people can’t appreciate the very human failing of Mike McQueary when he witnessed one of Sandusky’s heinous crimes firsthand. I’m with you on the condemnation he deserves for his response afterwards and in the many years since then, but I cannot blame him for failing to intervene in that moment. First, the report says that both Sandusky and the boy saw McQueary see them, so it’s likely that the rape ended at that moment (though we don’t know). Second, he’s human. The guy (McQueary) walked into the place (hallowed ground for him) late at night and was suddenly faced with a scene so horrific and so far outside his realm of possibility that it probably took him several seconds to even grasp what he was seeing. When humans are faced with situations like this, many (most?) of us will desperately seek to disappear, or to rationalize, or to reconcile what we’re seeing with the reality we’d been living in right up to then. In that moment, we choke. I agree that it’s critical that we not choke, for the victim, for our own humanity. But we do. 

Another reader:

As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, at the hands of a family member, and witnessed by another who did not intervene and who said nothing: THANK YOU. What that child most needed in that moment was rescuing, and McQueary turned his back on that. I remember that particular moment so intently; that someone who could have rescued me, whom I trusted, chose not to (and it was a choice). The lasting impact on my life has been a feeling that I was not worth helping.

There is such a lasting legacy from abuse, that I don’t believe others understand, no matter how well-intentioned. It is not what defines me, but it certainly impacts me. I never told, because a trusted member of my family knew and he didn’t speak up. My little ten year old brain processed that and decided I couldn’t tell my folks because then they would be forced to choose between me and other family members. So, I set about trying to save myself. I became a fixer and I took on enormous responsibilities, and blamed myself at the first sign of a problem.

Unfortunately, for me, that translated into marrying at 20, and tolerating emotional abuse for 20 years, all the while blaming myself for choosing him and trying to fix it, and doing such a great job of making things look great that everyone thought we were a “perfect” family with four wonderful kids to show for it. And then, I came undone, except I didn’t…my abuser was killed in a hit and run, the witness died of old age, and I suddenly saw the world as a safe place and I was able to put down the shame, the self-blame and guilt. I was finally able to truly save myself. As my therapist put it: I came into my own. It has been difficult, scary, and sad – for me and my kids. It is my daily prayer that time will heal and that we will all eventually find happiness.

I am not exactly sure why I am sharing all this with you, but it just feels right…after all, you share so much every day.

Another: 

Is the man a hero?  No.  Should he have done better?  Yes.  Is he “as depraved as others who stood by and did nothing?” I can’t agree. I was never told that the proper response to *anything* is physical violence.  If something terrible is happening, I’m supposed to call 911, not try to stop–for example–domestic violence.  I’d have been quite satisfied if he’d immediately called the police.  As it is, I find him several notches above those who did nothing, and several notches below who I’d like to associate with.

But this was a child! The imbalance of power, the over-whelming moral responsibility to stop it immediately, to rescue the child, should, in my view, trump everything else. Another:

On the letter by the reader giving a possible reason for McQueary’s terrible decision: please don’t confuse a reason with an excuse. People walk away from the sounds of domestic violence in the apartment upstairs, a child in China bleeding in the street, Kitty Genovese … go all the way up the chain into the Holocaust. People turn away. Why? We call it simple cowardice. I’m willing to bet if you asked McQueary just moments before he saw this rape, if you asked him, “what would you do if you saw a child being tortured?” He’d likely respond the way most of us would, by saying that he’d do everything to stop it, he’d rescue the child. But when faced with this actual situation, he did nothing. Well, he told his dad. And then, over the years, he likely justified this action in his mind, that he did do something. He did tell an authority, he probably reasons. 

It isn’t a good reason. It certainly isn’t an excuse. We, outside of that locker room would all say the same thing: we would rescue that child. We absolutely would. But then there’s Kitty. And the child bleeding to death on a street in China. And certainly there are the thousands of rapes of children in the Congo happening right now. People turn away. There’s no excuse. But until we find out what the reasons are that people turn away, how can we ensure that next time, they won’t? Given the (deserved) shaming of McQueary, how do we ensure that the next person tells someone, anyone at all, instead of just turning away and telling no one? 

We all, if asked in a comfortable setting, sipping a coffee and eating a gluten-free vanilla scone, will say without reservation that we would absolutely save that child. I bet McQueary thought so too, until he didn’t. I need to know how he reasoned it, how he lived with it, how he justified it, so that we can hopefully provide people with better fucking reasoning skills. 

A final reader:

What if McQeary himself was abused?  Are you saying that abuse survivors are supposed to react normally to seeing abuse of others?  Because if you are, you’re completely crossing the line.  You don’t have to know a whole lot about PTSD to understand that any trigger can paralyze a survivor – even just seeing a kid play with an adult.  Seeing another child being abused?  I’d give him credit for doing anything but curling up in a ball.

The lengths to which these readers will go to excuse someone who saw a child being anally raped and didn’t immediately stop it boggles my mind. But we have a policy of airing all dissents here, so make your own mind up. I stand by every word I wrote.

Can Perry Rebound?

Surely not. But Jay Newton-Small does her best:

Folks are just now starting to pay attention to the race. Traditionally, voters start to tune in and pick their horses after Thanksgiving. Newt Gingrich is peaking now. If Gingrich gets knocked off, there’s time for one, maybe two more waves before the first voting begins. Perry still has a window to the nomination if he can win Iowa and ride that momentum through South Carolina and into Florida. The anti-Mitt Romney vote is still at 70%, so there is still a pretty big opportunity for an anti-Romney to solidify that vote before Romney becomes Mr. Inevitable. It’s not the wide window of opportunity he once had, but with an improved performance, Perry can squeeze himself through it. Of course, that’s a lot of ifs. And once this window closes, Perry’s transformation into a zombie candidate will be complete.

Getting A Boost From Mental Illness

Genes associated with autism and schizoprenia may have given an edge to early humans:

For hundreds of thousands of years our ancestors made do with an array of hand axes, scrapers and thrusting spears. Then, around 100,000 years ago, there was a technological revolution, with many new and sophisticated implements appearing. … [Archaeologist Penny Spikins] argues that this technological tool revolution may have been triggered by a greater tolerance for people with traits on the autism spectrum. "I'm not saying that someone who isn't autistic wouldn't understand this technology, but that the innovation is more likely to come from someone who is systematic and has that unique focus on precision," she says.

Further thoughts from Penny Spikins here.

Bialek’s Story Confirmed

The woman Cain said he couldn't remember, despite meeting her in public six weeks previously, now has a contemporaneous witness to the sexual assault:

In a statement read to reporters in Shreveport, La., [pediatrician Victor] Zuckerman, [Bialek's boyfriend at the time] says Bialek went to dinner with Cain in Washington and returned "upset. She said Mr. Cain had touched her in an inappropriate manner."

Zuckerman was joined at the news conference by lawyer Gloria Allred, who represents Bialek. The doctor, who described himself as a Republican, said he came forward to "aid the public in evaluating the statements previously made by Mr. Cain and Ms. Bialek."

Cain should withdraw from the race.

Malkin Award Nominee

"If you look at China, they don't have food stamps. They don't have the modern welfare state, and China's growing. And so what I would do is look at the programs that LBJ gave us with the Great Society and they'd be gone," – Michele Bachmann, Christianist.

And people wonder why I refuse to call these people Christians.

Why Are Simple Regulations So Hard?

Kevin Drum explains:

We live in a complex world, and that means the rules are sometimes complex too. But they don't have to be anywhere near as complex as they end up being. We could have a simple tax code, simple environment rules, and blunt financial regulations. We could probably cut the size of agency regulations by 10 times if we wanted to. But businesses don't want to. Sure, they'd prefer no regulation at all, but they know that's not in the cards. So in public they bemoan complexity, but in private they fight endlessly for more of it. To their lawyers, every single extra page is an extra opportunity to make more money.

Veronique de Rugy takes Drum's argument in another direction. Drum pushes back.