What Actually Just Happened In Libya?

151956415

Ackerman has a useful rundown:

It was not a simple mob that attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Tuesday, killing four Americans. Benghazi was the scene of a pitched battle, one in which unknown Libyan assailants besieged American diplomats with small-arms fire for over four hours, repelling several attempts by U.S. personnel to regain control of it.

Nor was what happened in Benghazi a simple story of Americans assaulted by the Libyans they helped to liberate from Moammar Gadhafi last year, American officials say. Libyan security forces and a sympathetic local militia helped the Americans to suppress the attack and get the diplomats inside to safety.

That account is the first official telling of Tuesday’s events. It’s preliminary, as much of what has been initially reported in the media on Wednesday has proven incorrect. And it was provided to reporters late Wednesday afternoon by Obama administration officials who would not speak for the record.

Continued here. Another take on the same lines here:

This is Libya’s extreme right.

And, while much is still uncertain, Tuesday’s attack appears to have been their attempt to escalate a strategy they have employed ever since the Libyan revolution overthrew Colonel Qaddafi’s dictatorship. They see in these days, in which the new Libya and its young institutions are still fragile, an opportunity to grab power. They want to exploit the impatient resentments of young people in particular in order to disrupt progress and the development of democratic institutions.

A good rule when trying to absorb breaking news like this is to wait. That applies to bloggers as well as presidential candidates. J.D. Tuccille asks why Ambassador Stevens wasn't better protected:

By contrast to the Benghazi compound, the U.S. embassy in Cairo, which also came under attack with a better outcome, is described as a "fortress-like U.S. mission." Granted, the U.S. embassy to Libya is in Tripoli and the Benghazi consulate is a lesser facility, but Libya strikes me as the sort of place where any American presence should be "fortress-like."

Juan Cole adds:

Why in the world [Stevens] was in an insecure minor consulate in a provincial city on September 11 is a mystery to me.

(Photo: An armchair and parasol float in the swimming pool of the US consulate in Benghazi on September 13, 2012, following an attack on the building late on September 11 in which the US ambassador to Libya and three other US nationals were killed. By Gianluigi Guercia/AFP/Getty Images)

Romney’s Chief Ally, Ctd

Joe Klein took Netanyahu to task yesterday on Morning Joe, in a few moments that made Bob Wright’s day:

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Money quote:

I don’t think I’ve ever, in the 40 years I’ve been doing this, have heard of another of an American ally trying to push us into war as blatantly and trying to influence an American election as blatantly as Bibi Netanyahu and the Likud party in Israel is doing right now. I think it’s absolutely outrageous and disgusting. It’s not a way that friends treat each other. And it is cynical and it is brazen. And by the way, a little bit of history here: In December of 2006, George W. Bush went over to the Pentagon, met with the joint chiefs of staff and asked them, “What do you think about military action in Iran?” They were unanimously opposed to it. And as far as I know, the United States military, the leaders of the United States military, are unanimously opposed to it to this day. This is a fool’s errand. It would be a ridiculous war with absolutely no good coming of it.

Klein elaborates at his blog:

Netanyahu is doing two things that should be intolerable for any patriotic American: he is a foreigner trying to influence our presidential campaign and he is a foreigner trying to shove us into a war of choice in a region where far too many Americans have already died needlessly. The Romney campaign–as well as AIPAC, the AJC and every other American Jewish organization–should make it clear to Netanyahu that his interventions into our political process and policy-making are not welcome here.

Recent Dish on Netanyahu here and here.

Ask John Hodgman Anything: Why All The Doomsday Fear-Mongering?

You probably recognize Hodgman from his appearances on The Daily Show and those ubiquitous Apple ads, but be sure to check out his book, That Is All, an audio and paperback version of which are being released October 2, along with The Complete World Knowledge box set. Excerpts here:

That is All is predicated on the premise (ahem, CERTAIN KNOWLEDGE) that, starting quite soon, we will enter a pre-apocalyptic period leading up to the end of the world, or to be more specific, Hodgman’s “COMING TOTAL ULTRACOLLAPSE OF CIVILIZATION AND END OF HUMAN HISTORY,” but which may conveniently be referred to using the Norse term Ragnarok. You may think this is a joke, but it is deadly serious — this really is the end, because indeed, Hodgman has finally decided to write about topics including WINE and SPORTS, which were dismissed in his previous volumes. The end is nigh, and it has a bouquet with hints of fruit, albuterol, and jokes.

John also wrote The Areas Of My Expertise and More Information Than You Require. Check out his podcast here. Previous videos of John here, here and here. “Ask Anything” archive here.

Quotes For The Day

"This is the time for us as a nation and a people to stand united,' – Ronald Reagan, Republican candidate, after president Carter's botched mission to save US hostages.

"I unequivocally support the president of the United States — no ifs, ands or buts — and it certainly is not a time to try to go one-up politically. He made a difficult, courageous decision," – George H.W. Bush, a candidate at the same time.

And people tell me the GOP hasn't changed.

The Man Romney Used

VileRatSeanSmith

Sean Smith, one of the Americans murdered in Benghazi was a huge force in the online multiplayer game EVE Online. He was on Jabber when the attack happened. His last words there, one reader tells us, were "FUCK", "GUNFIRE". This is an obituary from his "alliance leader". A reader writes:

I am a player in EVE Online, part of the coalition where Sean (aka Vile Rat) was such an important player. Here’s an excerpt of the coalition’s jabber announcement channel (which on a normal day is mostly filled up by fleet operation announcements), after his death was made public:

(11:08:36 PM) directorbot@goonfleet.com/directorbot: My people, we have been dealt a grevious blow tonight, as people and as players. I, and all of us who knew Sean, are still reeling. And yet, to my horror, already Vile Rat's death has become a machination in Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. I do not speak of politics often because American politics do not matter in an international game of internet spaceships. But this sickens me, and Vile Rat would not have wanted to become a tool for the Romney campaign. Just this morning, he said this in Illum regarding the RNC:

(12:41:07 PM) kismeteer: vile_rat: Was there anyone in that group that you even partially respected?
(12:41:14 PM) vile_rat: on the republican side?
(12:41:17 PM) kismeteer: yeah
(12:41:20 PM) vile_rat: nope. not a one.

And now we see this: "I'm outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi," Romney said in the statement. "It's disgraceful that the Obama Administration's first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks."

My fury is boundless. Our friend should not be used in this way. We have only so many ways to make our voices heard, but if enough of us shout loudly enough we can – as we have seen – force the media to notice. Retweet this. ALL OF YOU. I will not have Sean's memory desecrated by American presidential politics.

Update from a reader:

It was a bit weird to load your blog this morning and see my friend's face on it. I've known Sean for close to 15 years now, and the fact that his death is international news doesn't make any less sad, but it does make it very strange. I don't have much of anything to add to what your other reader sent you, but there is an attempt to raise money for his family, and you can do so here.

For a full roundup of Dish coverage, go to the "Embassy Attacks In Libya and Egypt" thread page. (To jump to today's coverage, click here.) Above photos from Eve Online and Facebook, via Russell Jones.

Ask Reihan Anything

Ask Reihan Anything

[Updated from yesterday with many questions added by readers]

Reihan Salam, long-time friend of the Dish, our first kinda-staffer back in the day, and one of the brightest lights among young conservatives, is hard to put in a box:

He is a columnist for The Daily and lead writer of The Agenda blog at National Review, as well as a policy adviser at e21 and a contributing editor at National Affairs. He co-authored Grand New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream with Ross Douthat. … He strongly supported the Iraq war but has since called it a disaster of "world-historical proportions." He advocates policies that strengthen traditional family structure and has supported gay marriage for years. Salam has taken a strong interest in congestion pricing and the encouragement of denser living arrangements, the promotion of natural gas and nuclear power, reform of the U.S. tax code, and the fostering of a more competitive and diverse marketplace of educational providers.

To submit a question for Reihan, simply enter it into the field at the top of the Urtak poll (ignore the "YES or NO question" aspect and simply enter any open-ended question). We primed the poll with questions you can vote on right away – click "Yes" if you have a strong interest in seeing Reihan answer the question or "No" if you don't particularly care. We will air his responses soon. Thanks to everyone for participating.

iYawn

Mat Honan calls the iPhone 5 "simultaneously […] the best phone on the market and really, really boring." Timothy B. Lee is in the same ballpark:

[W]hat’s striking about the phone is what’s missing: a compelling story about what makes this phone better than its predecessor or distinguishes it from its competitors. The iPhone 4 had the Retina Display, Apple‘s marketing term for a display with twice the horizontal and vertical resolution of previous models. Sure, the term was silly, but it captured the imagination of consumers and became a must-have feature across Apple’s product lines. Similarly, the big story of the iPhone 4S, announced shortly before Steve Jobs died, was Siri, the voice-activated personal assistant that attracted a ton of attention and coverage from the tech blogosphere.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the iPhone 5, the first iPhone to be largely developed after Steve Jobs’s passing, seems to lack a comparable sales pitch.

Manjoo is upset that the dock connector has changed:

I get why Apple needed to change the connector. But man is this going to be a pain. Like every other gadget user on the planet, I’ve accumulated a host of accessories to accommodate Apple’s old dock. Among them, my car (which features an old-style dock connector in the glovebox) and my clock radio. I’ve also got lots of charging cords sitting around my house, all designed to power up my phone and iPad wherever I go. Now all those things—tens of millions of iOS-compatible accessories—have been rendered obsolete. The only way to plug the new iPhone and iPods into gadgets bearing the old dock is to buy an ungainly adapter. Apple will sell you the adapter for $29, which is the definition of being unfriendly to your customers.

Women Aren’t Victims Of The Hookup Culture, Ctd

A reader quotes another:

The root causes of generational fatherlessness and poverty are more about lack of comprehensive sex education in schools and access to health care, ie, birth control.

Really? Access and education? Do you really believe that that there are more than a handful of single moms that did not know about birth control at the time of their pregnancy? When pretty much every convenience store (at least in New York City) has a slew of condoms hanging behind the counter, there is no access? That any woman that has already had a child is ignorant of birth control? Come on. This reply was just another example of liberals treating people like idiots.

Another pounces on another:

But it's mostly the phrase that keeps sticking in my craw – culture of death. Culture of death? Sex is the foundation of life!

Yes. Yes, it is. Therefore, a culture that constantly tells people to take the act that is the foundation of all life, strip it of its pesky life-giving properties using devices and/or chemicals, and use it as a recreational activity in superficial encounters with people you don't care about and may never want to see again (any accidental offspring of which have a good chance of being aborted) … is viewed by many as a culture of death.

The Leader Vanishes

Evan Osnos offers some precedent for the unexplained public disappearance of the to-be president of China, Xi Jinping:

Most plausible, for the moment, is that Xi’s people are managing the optics. If, in fact, he is hobbling around with a slipped disc, or had a mild heart attack, they will almost certainly prevent him from being shown in public looking frail. In modern Chinese history, physical robustness has always been used as a proxy for political health; when Chairman Mao was locked in battles with internal foes in late 1965, he sequestered himself for months of plotting and then burst back on to the scene to show his vigor by swimming the Yangtze. By then in his early seventies, Mao showed that he was very much alive and, to those who chose to see it that way, challenging old Confucian principles of physical modesty and humility. (The propagandists overegged the pudding a bit and said Mao swam nine miles in sixty-five minutes that day, which, as Time noted, would have been a world-record pace.)

Premier Li Peng similarly left the stage for several months in 1993 after he suffered a heart attack, and the exact reasons for the disappearance of Mao's heir-apparent, Lin Biao, remain unclear. Meanwhile, Jeremy Page explains the ramifications of Xi's disappearance for the leadership transition, set to take place in early October:

If he reappears within the next week or so, it is unlikely to affect the personnel changes at the 18th Communist Party Congress, when Mr. Xi is expected to take over President Hu Jintao's most powerful post as general secretary of the party, they said. But if Mr. Xi is out of the public eye for much longer than that, his absence could influence the succession plans….

Malcolm Moore reports on the recent speculation among prominent Chinese commentators:

"Although people have said he suffered a back injury, he actually had a heart attack, a myocardial infarction," said Li Weidong, a political commentator in Beijing and the former editor of China Reform. The magazine is influential among Chinese policymakers and under the aegis of the [government]. Other unnamed sources have also suggested that Mr Xi, 59, suffered a heart attack, while Willy Lam, the former editor of the South China Morning Post, believes China's president-in-waiting had a stroke and is currently unable to show his face in public.

Meanwhile, China Digital Times rounds up the terms that the government is now blocking on China's Twitter-like Weibo:

back injury (??): One rumor has it that Xi has disappeared to nurse a hurt back.
crown prince (??): A  nickname for Xi….
XJinping (X??): A combination of pinyin and Chinese characters invented to get past the censors.
Jinping + car accident (??+??): Another rumor has spread that Xi and (PSC) member  were in a car accident on September 4. This has yet to be verified….
Vice Chairman (???): Xi’s current position.
impose martial law (??)

Electing An Introvert, Ctd

GT_CLINTON-OBAMA-STAGE_120912

Many readers are echoing this one:

President Obama is clearly an introvert, but John Heilemann's assertion – "I don’t think he doesn’t like people. I know he doesn’t like people. He’s not an extrovert; he’s an introvert" – is startling.  Heilemann assumes that introverts do not like people and that extroverts do. That's just not true. Introverts prefer solitude and tend to go inward when deliberating.  Extroverts, on the other hand, prefer the multitude and tend to move outward when deliberating.  Introverts may very well like people but find themselves uncomfortable in a crowd. Extroverts might very well dislike people but still find themselves very comfortable in a crowd, even if they don't like the people in the crowd. Introversion and extroversion describe innate preferences for ordering one's surroundings, not the way one feels about people.

Another boils it down:

I once heard a great one-sentence description of the difference: if being in a crowd of unfamiliar people energizes you, you're an extrovert; if it enervates you, you're an introvert.

Another plugs Rauch's beloved manifesto:

I went hunting for one of the best short articles I've read about introverts and found that it came from The Atlantic – "Caring For Your Introvert." 

Politics, as Jonathan Rauch points out, tends to be dominated by extroverts, with Bill Clinton taking extroversion to previously unachieved levels.  I agree that Obama is an introvert, and the presidency must be more than exhausting for him for that reason alone.  As a major introvert who practices medicine, I work with people all day, every day, sometimes in intense situations.  I love people and find them fascinating, but I need a lot of time alone to recuperate. 

By the way, there's also a new book out called Quiet by Susan Cain – subtitled "The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking". It's a really interesting read.

Another compares Obama and Clinton:

Since extroversion and introversion very much have to do with where we get energy, it's not surprising that Obama's introversion leads him to spurn spending time with people when he needs to conserve energy.  The campaign trail must be a drag for him – not because he doesn't like people, but because it exhausts him. And Bill Clinton of course gets tremendous energy from other people.  In particular Clinton is an extroverted thinker and draws energy from the space between him and anybody else.  And if they're introverts, he must exhaust them.  He doesn't necessarily like "people" any more than Obama.  He likes the charge they give him.  At least in this small way, Clinton likes being with people because of what they do for him, not because of what he can do for them.

Another relates to Obama:

My husband is a classic introvert, and spends a great deal of his day alone. But, like the president, he lights up around people, laughs quickly, and enjoys their company very much.  He just doesn't want to spend all day with them.  He is not recharged emotionally by being with people in the same way that an extrovert is.  Obama has always struck me as someone who has a great emotional intelligence and relates to people very well.  He's not a glad-hander, but I don't trust that so much, myself, so that appeals to me.  He is like me in that we prefer the intimacy of a one-on-one conversation to a large party.

Another:

You can see why having crazy Joe Biden around is so necessary. Decades of backslapping and cajoling.

Another looks to the president's past:

I wonder how much Obama's management style comes from his own personal ethos versus his background as an organizer. As much as this conversation makes the hard-right foam at the mouth, it is true that Obama's specific background in Alinsky-influenced institutional organizing has very established rules about separating your public life from your personal life. Obama's small inner-circle might be more a symptom of intentional design than personal uneasiness.

The fact the he isn't on a speed-dial basis with House Ds or Rs is also not surprising in the context of the organizing world: his analysis (right or wrong) is that his points of contact (Pelosi, Reid, Cantor, Boehner, McConnell) speak for their constituencies and that building personal relationships of the backslapping, fat-chewing variety with these members is definitely inefficient and possibly disruptive to his larger goals. I think that chalking all of this up to Obama's distaste for small-talk is to miss the larger point of how he views the presidency, first and foremost: as a job. I think that is, for better or worse, a distinction that Clinton can't make.  Ryan Lizza's excellent piece for TNR, "The Agitator", does a better job of detailing the finer points of this than I could.

Another:

Always remember that our most celebrated president was also our most celebrated introvert: Abraham Lincoln.

More than 50 readers offered their thoughts on the subject but we unfortunately don't have space for all of them. However, you can continue the conversation at our unfiltered Facebook page, where we started a thread on introversion vs extroversion.

(Photo: Former President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama after Clinton's speech during the 2012 Democratic National Convention at the Time Warner Center on September 5, 2012. By Michel du Cille/The Washington Post via Getty Images)