Brain Hacking

Geeta Dayal flags new research on subjects wearing brainwave headsets:

A team of security researchers from Oxford, UC Berkeley, and the University of Geneva say that they were able to deduce digits of PIN numbers, birth months, areas of residence and other personal information by presenting 30 headset-wearing subjects with images of ATM machines, debit cards, maps, people, and random numbers in a series of experiments. The paper, titled “On the Feasibility of Side-Channel Attacks with Brain Computer Interfaces,” represents the first major attempt to uncover potential security risks in the use of the headsets.

Marriage Equality On The Big Stage

Tuesday night in Charlotte, the Democratic Party’s newfound bullishness on marriage equality was championed by speaker after speaker, while last week’s GOP headliners tended to downplay their position:

“As president, I will protect the sanctity of life,”  [Romney said in his convention speech]. “I will honor the institution of marriage. And I will guarantee America’s first liberty: the freedom of religion.” The remarks capped three nights of prime-time convention speeches in which top Romney surrogates subtly acknowledged the marriage equality issue in somewhat coded language. Vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan called Romney a “defender of marriage” in his speech Wednesday, while Ann Romney had said, “What Mitt and I have is a real marriage.” Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee was more explicit at the podium, calling President Obama a “self-professed evangelical” who “supports changing the definition of marriage.”

So far the anti-marriage equality attack ads have been limited to small outside spending groups. Here is a billboard the Republican Union PAC is using to target Catholic voters in five battleground states:

RepublicanUnionPACbillboard

And here is a TV ad running in North Carolina this week from the Campaign for American Values, a small evangelical-run Super PAC which supports Romney:

But notice the difference between that ad and this one supporting the marriage equality push in Minnesota (bad actors vs. real people, production values, etc):

The Democrats might not be making big ads attacking Republicans for opposing marriage equality yet, but this is yet more evidence of a dramatically changing landscape, and enthusiasm gap, from even a year ago.

(Photo by Mark Segal)

The Splintering Of Syria

Sarah Birke and Katie Paul report on the country's "fracturing rebellion":

[T]he men in Jabal Zawiya offer an insight into the evolving power structures in Syria as Bashar al-Assad’s regime contracts. The groups are currently bound together by a common aim to rid the country of Assad and strive not to act like his regime, but the seeds of struggles are being planted—aided by the brewing geopolitical reckoning. Rather than build the united country once imagined by protesters, rebel warlords are each taking their own bit of land and implementing their own vision—though militarily coordination continues. Maarouf is creating a police force and referring to Syrian national laws. Abu Issa is constructing his fiefdom based on religious principles. Ali Bakran, perhaps the most representative of the protesters’ original aims, is, for now at least, losing out.

Not Moving Towards Happiness

Would we be happier living in constant sunshine? Not necessarily:

[Nobel prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman’s] decades of cognitive research, much of it done in collaboration with longtime colleague Amos Tversky, has shown that humans are subject to what he calls a "focusing illusion." We focus on the moment, overestimating the importance of certain factors in determining our future happiness and ignoring the factors that really matter. For this reason, people commonly assume that moving to a warmer climate will make them significantly happier. This is not the case at all, as a 1998 large-sample study of Kahneman’s showed; overall life satisfaction in the Midwest and California, the regions sampled, was nearly identical. 

Earlier Dish on Kahneman here and here.

Don’t Feel Sorry For Our Soldiers

James Joyner insists that “veterans don’t need our pity”:

[It’s] important not to let anecdotal evidence mislead us into thinking that most veterans are struggling to cope with life outside the structure of the service. That couldn’t be further from the truth. Indeed, according to the Census Department, America’s veterans are more likely to have a high school diploma than non-veterans, and have a much higher median income.

That’s not surprising, when you think about it. While the public may see veterans as saps who volunteered to do a dangerous job because they lacked other options, the fact of the matter is that simply getting into the military requires meeting demanding thresholds of physical and mental health, passing a criminal background check, and having a high school diploma. After selection, many wash out during entry-level training. I’m by no means arguing that every man or woman who’s ever served in our armed forces is a candidate for MENSA. But the selection process weeds out the weakest elements, and the training and mentoring system inculcates work habits and social skills that are invaluable in coping with life.

Why Isn’t Hillary At The Convention?

Because that would be illegal:

Federal law — the Hatch Act of 1939, amended by Congress in 1993 — specifically prohibits secretaries of state from attending political conventions, and the State Department's own ethics guidelines also rule out political activity. A senior administration official, speaking on background because the official is not authorized to speak on the record, told CNN, "The law carved out the State Department as having a unique position in the government in that foreign policy, by its nature, must remain nonpartisan/apolitical."

Clinton, who is on an eleven-day trip to Asia, will miss the Democratic convention for the first time in four decades.

Clinton’s Big Speech: Blog Reax

Clinton_Obama_GT

Joe Klein was seriously wowed:

I can’t think of any politician who talks as good as Bill Clinton. Certainly, no politician has ever been able to unpack and explain dry, complicated policy nuances in as juicy and entertaining a manner. The folks at Fox were speculating that the speech was overly wonky and maybe a lot of people got bored and turned off their televisions. Wishful thinking, no doubt. That’s what they always said about his epic State of the Union filibusters–and they were always wrong. People like listening to this guy. He’s informal, and informative, in a way that Obama, sadly, has never been able to be–otherwise the folks would have known all that good stuff about the health care plan, and the stimulus plan. But then, Obama’s in good company: as I said, Clinton’s the most compelling policy wonk I’ve ever heard. And there is no second place.

Scott Galupo calls Clinton's speech "yet another virtuoso performance from a man whose political talents, however at times infuriating and mendacious, you can’t help but wish were deployed on your side’s behalf":

Earlier this week, I argued that former President Bill Clinton would aim his convention address primarily at fence-sitting whites. I was wrong. He did more than that. He did everything, and he arguably did it better than President Obama has ever done in his own right. … Clinton’s wasn’t just a speech aimed at wavering whites — although it certainly was that (many g’s were dropped, and the president referred to himself as a "county boy" at one point). It was aimed at seniors, women, and young people, and, with its riffs on voter ID laws and Medicaid, immigrants and minorities and people with disabilities.

Will Wilkinson applauds:

As for form, no living political figure can match Mr Clinton's rhetorical ear, improvisational lability, or daemonic audience connection. As for content, Mr Clinton's typically overstuffed address packed in more policy detail than the entire GOP convention, all while maintaining a coherent narrative thread. A few tendentious points aside, it was a masterful speech which redeemed an otherwise embarrassing night for the Democrats.

Chris Cillizza admires Clinton's political skills:

He was the explainer-in-chief without seeming too preachy. He was full of Southern aphorisms without being hokey.  And, perhaps most importantly of all, Clinton was quite clearly having a very good time — and he let it show. He adlibbed. He played with the crowd. He smiled and laughed. And, yes, he went on a little too long.  But, if you are a student of campaign politics — like we are — what you watched tonight was the work of someone with massive natural ability in the political arena.

Michael Barone hopes the speech will overshadow Obama's:

The Obama campaign in giving Clinton such a lead role risks making Obama look small by comparison. But evidently the campaign strategists think there are some serious weaknesses they need to shore up.

Tomasky raves:

Holy smokes. That was the best political speech more or less ever. There wasn’t a thing he didn’t touch on, and there wasn’t a thing he didn’t just blast out of the park. His carriage and delivery nailed it for partisans and for persuadables. He hit Republican obstructionism. He slammed the Romney and Ryan plans on virtually every point they’ve raised in the last six months, from the welfare ads to the tax cuts to the Medicare "cuts" to so much more, and he did it in detail.

Andrew Sprung sees the purpose of the speech:

Well, it took Bill Clinton a long time to get to the heart of his speech. But what a mighty heart it proved to be. What a giant enterprise. He set himself singlehandedly to counter a billion dollars in attack ads, to break through the core Republican lies and obfuscations.  …The written speech is tighter than the spoken one. But when he got to Obama, he delivered a more robust and detailed litany of his accomplishments in office than any prior speaker.  And when he got to the GOP proposals and attacks, he spoke as if his own legacy, and the country's future, were on the line. 

And Ed Kilgore thinks small:

If nothing else, this speech should convince Team Mitt to take Clinton’s image out of their mendacious ads.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Clinton’s Big Speech: Tweet Reax

GT_CLINTON-SCREEN_120905

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Daily Wrap

GT_BILLOBAMA_120906
Tonight on the Dish, Andrew applauded Clinton's speech, saying "he finally told [Obama's] story." Earlier in the day, Andrew said "of course, we're better off" than four years ago, as he worried about Elizabeth Warren's convention prominence and clarified data from last night's speeches.

In additional convention coverage, Dems ran a two-toned event, Sargent explained the basis for the Obama team's confidence and the GOP huffed about the Ted Kennedy tribute video. Millman ho-hummed about Clinton's speech, readers reacted to Charlotte Day 1 and Deval Patrick's QOTD here. Meanwhile, the GOP won the stimulus rhetoric war and Clint's speech left as big an impression as Romney's did. And as readers considered the MS plights of Ann Romney and Michelle Obama's father, Scott Morgan bet that Dems wouldn't talk about pot.

In campaign commentary, Walter Kirn called 2012 the "most compelling election in years," Beinart highlighted the Dem's overall strategy and the blogosphere debated Romney's gubernatorial record. And while the Romney campaign perpetuated Ryan's Jamesville fib, Dems looked as if they have a chance to hold the Senate and Jack Shafer posited a fact-checking theory.

In assorted coverage, Andrew called out new data on circumcision and admired John Cage. Marc Lynch posed a question about Arab monarchs, a reader weighed in on the controversy of American Indian lineage and Glaswegians died at high rates. Peter Salisbury warned of Yemen's water situation as Lindsay Abrams reviewed the dark history of ex-gay therapy.

Meanwhile, a Scot found an old bottle, Keith Humphreys examined the gateway effect and the TSA swabbed coffee. Kottke admired the paralympics race, and as Hanna discussed minority women, Fred Clark augured mobile home trouble and Cord Jefferson assessed tchotchkes.

VFYW here, FOTD here, more cat predation here, and don't forget to ask Ta-Nehisi Coates anything!

G.G.

(Photo by David T. Foster/Charlotte Observer/MCT via Getty Images)