One benefit of this primary campaign: have black women voters ever been this thoroughly fought over? Maya Angelou has famously endorsed Clinton. Now Alice Walker backs the "real" and "complex" Obama. I can’t believe I find myself agreeing with Walker. But I guess times change. And I think our world-historical challenges demand thinking outside our existing categories:
Category: The Dish
TPM and the Blogosphere
Josh Marshall’s pioneering site gets its CJR profile. Money quote:
"I think within TPM lies the DNA of the future of journalism," says Justin Rood, a former TPM Muckraker reporter who now works for ABC News. "In terms of its relationship with its audience, its ability to advance stories incrementally and to give credit to other news organizations, and its ability to get the story to readers—it’s been able to foster a real spirit of collaboration."
Rood’s vision is plausible enough—but it seems equally possible that TPM will be remembered fifty years from now as a brief efflorescence, as something like I.F. Stone’s Weekly….
"Brief efflorescence" is another word for life, right? Keep going, Josh …
Narrow Minds, Wide Stances
Ed Brayton says he’s discovered the best campaign slogan ever.
Feminists Have Better Sex
And so do the men who love them, apparently.
The Dancer And Obama
A reader writes:
The dancer is a great optical illusion. To make it shift, don’t stare at it directly. Look to the side, so that it only appears in your peripheral vision. It can also help to close one eye, to read some text, or to sweep your focus side to side across the page. The "illusion" is in fact mental, of course: it’s in how your brain is interpreting the data its getting, not in anything
physical/visual. At first, when the "switch" happens it’s just momentary – a split second – and then it shifts back. Only repeated switches will stabilize it in its new direction – after which you may not be able to make it switch BACK again! It’s a very strange sensation when you get the first "switch". After some practice, you can make it switch directions at will.
There are lessons here, aren’t there? Most of us are caught in left or right mode, absolutely sure that 1) we are right, 2) our opposite numbers are wrong, and 3) there’s no other rational way to interpret the data: isn’t it true that when you first watch the dancer – whether you think she’s spinning left or right – you simply can’t IMAGINE how anyone could rationally make the opposite interpretation? You can SEE she’s going left – or right. There’s absolutely no other option – until you see the shift. Then you realize both interpretations are right – and both are wrong. You realize it’s not either/or – it’s both/and.
Let’s get philosophical for a moment. Either/or is dualistic. It depends on setting things against each other – left vs right, us vs them, good vs evil, gay vs straight, liberal vs conservative. It’s inherently one-sided, and it always leads to conflict – or rather, it IS conflict itself. Taken into the realm of politics, we get the politicians and factions who live by division and trade on fear. It’s a very popular and powerful system, and we’ve just had six
plus years of it under Bush and Rove and the neocons. It’s been a real grad course in political philosophy for this country – "The Politics of Fear" (apparently Rudy’s trying to teach the course next term).
Ironically, as you may remember, this last term began with our professor – Professor Bush – proclaiming Jesus as his favorite political philosopher. Now, as I recall – and I believe you make this point in your book – the message of Jesus was "Be not afraid". Jesus pointed beyond dualism, conflict and fear to something higher, to that kind of patient, inclusive – dare I say loving – nondualism that comes from seeing that both left and right are both right and wrong.
And that, as I see it, is why you are really so enamored of Obama: he’s the only one out there who seems willing to rise above the politics of division and fear, and reach for something better, something higher, something that can bring us all together – not just here in this country, but globally.
Obama is not yet a hero – but he may become one. Whether he does or not, he will remain a human being – just one of us. But he carries a meme of hope and unity and love – so completely different than Bush, with his fear and antagonism and scorn. In my book, it’s Obama, and those like him, who can see beyond the illusions of dualism, and who hold the hope for the future.
That little dancer is worth contemplating.
Unbefuckinglievable
Apart from that booby dancer, this post on where to put the "fucking" in "unbelievable" is still stirring the email swarm. Many of you referred to "A Fish Called Wanda" where the question was clearly resolved:
Blog Post Of The Day
"Now, I’m not saying Mickey Kaus engages in sex acts with animals, but his deafening silence on Goatgate really speaks volumes, if you ask me," – a commenter on Matt’s blog.
Quote for the Day II
"I was very proud of my association with Mitt Romney. I’d worked hard for him here in the state. I was a co-chair of his campaign on Capitol Hill. And he not only threw me under his campaign bus, he backed up and ran over me again," – Larry Craig, another gay man experiencing whiplash from the Massachusetts Make-Over Man.
A Nuclear Power Renaissance?
We’re counting on it to tackle climate change and keep our energy supplies intact. The politicians hype it. But the industry itself is not as confident – and deeply reliant on foreign supplies.
Quote For The Day
"To portray Islam as a whole as a concerted threat to western security, and to imply that the West’s democratic institutions and freedoms are not proof against that threat, is absurd and close to treason. Then to demand that western freedoms be dismantled and stored away for the duration of a “war on terror” is to wave the flag of surrender.
This defeatism led the American Congress to allow its president to authorize torture and detention without trial in what Senator Robert Byrd called “the slow unraveling of the people’s liberties”. It enabled a British Home Office to curb free speech and habeas corpus. It arms police, fortifies buildings and impedes the free movement of citizens. It makes every Christian suspicious of every Muslim" – Simon Jenkins, The Times.

