The Daily Wrap

Today on the Dish we highlighted (here, here, here, here) Scott Horton's piece on the torturing and death of three people at Gitmo. Andrew grappled with the story here. As usual, nothing from the far right.

Nate Silver tried to make sense of the polling in Massachusetts and we rounded up election coverage from the weekend. Chait, Cohn, Joe Klein, and Josh Marshall explored the implications of Coakley losing the 60th vote on healthcare. More on why Coakley sucks here and why Brown is worse here. Andrew despaired here, here, and here. A broader take here. Readers tried to cheer him up.

More horrible details from Haiti emerged here, here, here, and here. Reihan insisted that the people be allowed to immigrate. We remembered MLK here and here. Another recession update here.

— C.B.

Now Just Sit Down And Read This, Okay?

OBAMATimSloan:AFP:Getty

A sane reader writes:

Glad the two-by-four e-mails were sent along. Sorry, would have sent one myself earlier, was beset by mammalian potty accidents and taking care of small children during MLK Day.

You know, the other thing that must be said about Obama, and forgive me if it has been said already, is that he, well, he gets up every day and makes the donuts. That in itself is a tremendous thing. He gets up every day and manages to live a family life and work while everyone is hurling fire, brimstone, and bs around him. And threatening his life.

And no, I don’t agree with everything that has gone on, but nor do I agree completely with Krugman today.

Obama has been working under unimaginably difficult circumstances. He inspires me because he has been getting up every day and doing what he is supposed to do, run the country.

I think the financial sector’s control of so much of the economy is a scandal, and I share your despair about Gitmo and our government torture program.  But the message of the past year is to be informed, to carry on, and to offer something constructive, however incremental.  It’s also to speak truth or at least good sense to the the crazies and the madness…at every level of life.  In that Obama can certainly not be faulted.  I mean, the presidency has its perks, but think of the crushing reality of that every day.  And yet there he is, and so is his family.  And here we are.

If Coakley loses, well, another way will present itself, and without more lives being lost I hope.

I get very frustrated, too, and my response is to volunteer and to try to do more.

Hang in there, go and sing loud and off-key in the shower or the garage (ours has great acoustics), it works for me.

(Photo: Tim Sloan/Getty.)

Chait Chimes In II

A reader writes:

Chait might be right, (though the outcry might be enough to allow the GOP to repeal it in ’11), but ultimately, I fear you’re right. I’m going to have to, by e-mail, congratulate my Tea Party uncle, who is rabidly anti-government intervention in anything. They want the Obama agenda to die, and they’re going to get their wish. In domestic affairs, they have succeeded in discrediting the mere idea of government.

In the end, it is ALL OUR fault. CBS talked to a Mass. independent who said he didn’t see the health care bill as a “necessary evil,” so he opposed it. As wonks know, the system is BROKEN, but, right now it still works for enough folks. In the end, we as a nation are unwilling to even risk sacrifice for the larger good.

That’s why Obama could fail, through little fault of his own.

From Depression To Rage

We have heard a lot from those furious that Obama has not solved all our problems overnight, how they feel that this country has somehow been taken away from them, how they feel a disconnect from the president. But maybe it's time for a different kind of rage, the kind this reader feels and I want to second:

The past year has been a very difficult one for me, personally and professionally. I've been up a lot more than I've been down, and I've been angry and frustrated with life, as we all are at times. But I can't remember the last time I felt such overwhelming rage toward a group of people as I have felt toward the Republican Party and the conservative movement since President Obama's election.

I simply cannot grasp what motivates these people, what compels them to thwart even the smallest attempts to clean up the enormous destruction they wrought under Bush and Cheney. Irresponsible, hateful, mendacious, sleazy, destructive – these words do not even begin to describe them.

I am unemployed and have not found a new job after almost a year of searching. I have a mortgage. I also have a preexisting medical condition, thanks to emergency surgery I had to undergo nearly 18 months ago. My unemployment benefits expire in five months, my COBRA not long after. Like untold millions of Americans, I am preparing for the worst as the economy slogs through its agonizing turnaround.

I voted for Obama with proud but open eyes, knowing full well not just the magnitude of the tasks he faced, but the pure, unrestrained malevolence of his opposition. Health care reform will unquestionably help people like me. And now some low-rent hairdo, whose sole claim to fame is posing naked for some ladies' magazine way back when, may happily destroy whatever chance this country has at moving in a more just, humane, and morally and fiscally responsible direction.

As you stated, the Republican Party of this new century is shot through with nihilists. Unabashed nihilists. But what leaves me shaking with anger damn near every day since President Obama's inauguration is the

pure smugness and nonchalance of their nihilism.

Palin, McConnell, DeMint, Boehner, Cantor, Rubio, Scott Brown and the rest of the Ailes- and Limbaugh-warped GOP: Would you trust any one of these goons to greet you at Wal-Mart, much less govern our country? The question answers itself. They literally care nothing for America. They have spent the past decade doubling the national debt, running up record deficits, indulging the depradations of Wall Street, expanding Medicare by a trillion dollars while refusing to cover the cost, needlessly and shamelessly cutting taxes by two trillion dollars while again refusing to cover the cost, degrading the Army and Marine Corps to the point where it will take them both at least a decade to recover, jailing and torturing detainees and lying about it, manipulating intelligence in order to invade Iraq out of some sick neocon thirst for vanity and glory. I could go on, but that would take hours, and only make me angrier.

Suffice to say that Republicans lecturing the country about fiscal responsibilty, economic recovery, governing - or anything else, for that matter – would be like Mick Jagger lecturing Mother Teresa about excessive promiscuity.

Karl Rove and Dick Cheney were thankfully not present at America's founding. But their political descendants will certainly be present at America's demise.

For Gods sake, vote for Coakley. Not for Coakley. For the rest of us.

What If Coakley Loses The 60th Vote? Ctd

Josh Marshall wonders if the House Democrats will pass the Senate bill:

As a matter of politics, I have little doubt that even for Dems in marginal districts, it's actually the safer call for them to vote for the bill a second time. Because the key is they already voted for it once. And from a strategic position in their districts, that is all that counts. Saying, 'yes, I voted for it but, hey, when it came back from conference I refused to vote for it again and it never came to a vote and the legislation died!' just ain't a distinction anyone's Republican opponents are going to allow.

I suspect it won't even cut it for those who actually voted no the first time. But it definitely won't work for those who already voted for it once. That's the lesson of 1994, the conservative and moderate Democrats who killed health care reform derived not an ounce of benefit for having done so. Indeed, they were slaughtered en masse.

Ben Smith's reading:

Along with the obvious problems of keeping the Blue Dogs on board and convincing the left to swallow a very bitter pill is context of the broader political response to a Brown victory, which may be, in Democratic circles, panic. ("It'll be like a nuclear bomb went off," one Democrat told me this week.) That's not to say it will be impossible. But it'll require a level of muscle that this White House hasn't yet, even in its hard and generally successful coalition-building, been forced to exert.

It's over. Rahm Emmanuel did such a great job, didn't he?