Our Favorite City To Destroy

Matt Novak speaks with history professor Max Page, author of The City’s End: Two Centuries of Fantasies, Fears and Premonitions of New York’s Destruction:

"It’s interesting because there are disaster fantasies [in books and movies] about lots of different places…. [But] what I was struck with is that New York has remained the predominant focus for literally close to two centuries." Page said. "It came to be the symbol of the city — not just the American city, but the city itself — with skyscrapers in the early 20th century."

Novak reflects on how this cinematic habit made 9/11 "surreal, but not unimaginable." Meanwhile, Elizabeth Rappe notes that the runner-up for onscreen destruction – after New York's 61 obliterations – is Los Angeles, which has been leveled 22 times. (However, given that there are 28 Godzilla films, Tokyo is another contender for second.)

Reporting With Your Mouth Shut

Katherine Boo, who has a recent book on the slums of India, describes her process. She finds that "listening and observing often work much better [and] reveal much more about the complexity of someone than the answers that they give to questions about themselves":

Often the people who have the most verbal dexterity have had some amount of education in their lives, and you don’t want to limit your reporting to just those people. You take a kid like Sunil, the young scavenger, he’s been raising himself, so conducting long interviews and eliciting illustrative anecdotes was out of the question. When I started spending time with him, it became clear that Sunil had an extremely strong aesthetic sense that helped him through life. Moments of natural beauty were very important to him. For example, there were parrots on the other side of the sewage way, and some boys would climb up and capture the parrots and sell them at the market. Sunil felt so strongly that this was wrong. He thought the parrots should be left where they were so that everybody could hear and see them.

Another time, he found six purple lotuses blooming on an airport wall and protected them, kept them a secret, so that no one could cut them down and sell them. These aspects of his character emerged over time from observation. I wasn’t going to get them through conversation. It’s one thing to have somebody talk about what they value in whatever language they have; it’s another thing to really see what they value. And with Sunil, after it became clear he had this sense, I could talk to him about it. I still asked questions, and a lot of them—endless questions if you ask some—but what works best for me is when I can observe something and then ask the person about that moment afterward.

When Sleeping Is Dangerous

Doree Shafrir recounts her terrifying parasomnia and explores why there's no cure:

It is the middle of the night, and there is something very wrong in my apartment. I leap up from my bed and rush to the closet and crouch down and throw aside my shoes, which are arranged on a rack on the floor. I know I must work quickly; I am breathing fast and hard. There — there, behind the shoes, I see it: I don’t know what it is, but it needs to come out, or I am going to die. I pull and pull and finally get it out. But something is still wrong. I am now completely panicked, and I jump back onto my bed and lean over the half-wall that my bed is up against, overlooking the hallway. There, I see what’s causing all the problems, and I push it downward and off the wall with all my might. It shatters loudly, glass flying everywhere.

Then, finally, I wake up. My two dogs are cowering in the corner, and I put on shoes to sweep up the glass. I am confused and embarrassed, though there is no one besides the dogs there to see that I just pushed a framed poster off a wall and broke it. I clean up the glass and go back to sleep, and it is not until the morning, when I see my shoes scattered everywhere, that I look into the closet and realize that I have also ripped the TV cable completely out of the back wall of my closet.

The unsatisfying root of Shafrir's disorder is stress. She spoke with Mike Birbiglia, who chronicled his own battle with dangerous sleepwalking in the recent film, Sleepwalk With Me (trailer above).

Obama’s Speech: Blog Reax

Obama_Speech

Ezra Klein is relatively upbeat:

If you looked past the rhetoric and focused just on the policy, this was a modest speech. It was a more humble vision. What President Obama offered the country on the final night of the Democratic convention was reminiscent of what Warren G. Harding offered almost a century ago: A return to normalcy after a long period of emergency.

Douthat thought Obama played it safe:

This was a pure stay-the-course speech, workmanlike and occasionally somewhat distant, with a few inspired and moving passages standing out amid a litany of rhetorical moves that the president has made many times before. There was only the most general sketch of a second term agenda, only a relatively cursory defense of the president’s economic stewardship, and mostly assertions, rather than sustained arguments, to back up his claim that the country is headed (slowly) in the right direction.

Alex Massie agrees:

[I]t was mostly pretty familiar. Though he finished strongly there was less rhetoric than might have been expected and, frankly, the speech never quite managed to soar. On Twitter it was not hard to find people comparing it to a State of the Union address and that seemed a fair judgement. This is not a compliment.

Will Wilkinson's verdict:

 Mr Obama's speech was a pastiche of highlights from speeches we've heard again and again for the past four years, and will have inspired few but true-believers. He failed to defend his record half as well as Mr Clinton, nor did Mr Obama sketch as concrete and compelling a picture of the choice facing voters. The president is playing defence, and it showed. As a whole, the Democrats threw a better convention than did the Republicans. It didn't conclude on a soaring note, but neither did it end with a thud.

Larison focuses on the foreign policy section of the speech:

Some Republicans and conservatives bridled at Obama’s remark that Romney and Ryan are “new” to foreign policy. Of course, many of them made the same complaint against Obama, whose experience was indeed very limited. Obama and his supporters ignored it or sought to deflect it by appealing to good judgment. Regardless, one reason this jab irritates some Republicans so much is that it is a perfectly valid and fair criticism of the current Republican ticket, and it is one that they have used in the past and would have used if the roles were reversed this time.

Tomasky was bored:

Let’s be blunt. Barack Obama gave a dull and pedestrian speech tonight, with nary an interesting thematic device, policy detail, or even one turn of phrase. … This was the rhetorical equivalent, forgive the football metaphor, of running out the clock: Obama clearly thinks he’s ahead and just doesn’t need to make mistakes. But when football teams do that, it often turns out to be the biggest mistake of all, and they lose.

Drum felt Obama "phoned it in":

Overall, it was a decent wrapup. It was a decent defense of his first term. It was a decent appeal for votes. But there was nothing memorable, nothing forward looking, and nothing that drew a contrast with Romney in sharp, gut-level strokes. Obama was, to be charitable, no more than the third best of the Democratic convention's prime time speakers in 2012.

Josh Marshall suggests the speech was deliberately toned down:

The President’s advisors didn’t want that inspirational, rhetorical flourish avatar from four year’s ago. They wanted something steadier and more sober. But then it started to build, loftier and more aggressive. On balance, I think it was exactly the speech they wanted him to give.

Bob Wright wishes Obama hadn't attempted to revive hope:

I thought he worked too hard to salvage the "hope and change" meme. (He reportedly said "hope" 15 times!) It felt strained and made him sound defensive and even, in a weird way, vain. Sure, people need to be persuaded that America is on the right track, and that he's the guy who can sustain the momentum. But there were other ways to make that case (some of which, to be sure, he deployed). I guess I can see how he thought he had to directly confront the Republicans' ridicule of his 2008 leitmotif, but sometimes discretion is the better part of valor.

And Noah Millman was "underwhelmed at best":

I thought the speech as a whole was exceptionally weak. Not a sale closer – not by a long shot.

(Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)

Obama’s Speech: Tweet Reax

151393445

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The Daily Wrap

GT_OFAMILY_120806
Today on the Dish, Andrew live-blogged the last day of the convention, calling Obama's speech a non-gamechanger. And as Nate Silver reviewed the poll numbers, Andrew projected an Obama bump – something bloggers did too. Meanwhile, readers pushed back on Andrew's Bowles-Simpson argument and the omens looked good for tomorrow's job numbers.

Reviewing Clinton's performance yesterday, as bloggers reacted, Nate Cohn called Clinton the "perfect surrogate" and Frum found Clinton's highlighting of Medicaid effective. Buzzfeed deconstructed Clinton's riffs, Jonathan Bernstein noted that Republicans aren't into Clinton types and Dave Noon charted GOP platform god cameos.

Earlier in the day, Obama's campaign pushed the gay thing, Krauthammer conspiracy theorized and Michael Scherer broke down what Obama must accomplish. Andrew Romano studied Mitt's unfavorability, and Kornacki wondered about the effectiveness of Warren's speech as readers weighed in as well. Hillary, meanwhile, didn't break the law, Frank burnished a gavel, and James Joyner insisted that vets don't need our pity. And as Michelle Obama's speech charmed China, content-mongerers hogged convention rights.

In election coverage, Andrew worried about our debt levels, Joe Klein lamented the potential for political paralysis and Romney's mug might help him win. And while Romney's campaign aired a Clinton-Obama-schism ad, Larison doubted Romney's foreign policy moderation.

Armstrong cheated, a robot raced and cars drove themselves. Hanna Rosin defended hook-up culture – and explained the wage gap. Geeta Dayal flagged research on headsets, sun and happiness decoupled, and Syria splintered.

VFYW here, MHB here and don't forget to ask Ta-Nehisi anything – and John Hodgman, too!

 - G.G.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Live-Blogging Charlotte, Day Three

151391370

11.01 pm. Unlike Biden, Obama knows how to build a speech: "Yes, our path is harder but it leads to a better place." The Christianity of the man shines through at moments like this. He isn't promising heaven and earth (and he didn't last time, either); he's promising persistence in defending the middle class in a globalizing world economy and increasing social and economic inequality.

I don't think it was a game-changer. I do think it sets an optimistic tone for the campaign and a stark choice for Americans this fall. This convention was much better than last week's. Clinton's speech alone was worth the whole thing. But this will now be decided in the debates. They will be more than usually vital. I suspect Obama kept his waverers on his side tonight, fired up his base, but failed to break away. We'll see.

I loved him. But I'm biased. I think he's been the best thing to happen to America in a long time and he has achieved more in tougher circumstances against historical odds than anyone has a right to expect. I cannot justify supporting this man and his ambitious attempt to re-balance America at home and abroad in 2008 and not helping him see it through to the end.

And I suspect that, even in these difficult times, many will give this sincere man a chance to prove himself and realize his full promise with four more years. You don't vote for a man who plays a long game and call it quits at half-time. At least Americans don't.

11 pm. He has now inverted the "hope" theme. He isn't giving Americans hope; they are giving it to him by their response to the challenges of the last few years. And I'm sure it's sincere. The story of the recovering veteran is used to tell a story about a recovering America.

10.59 pm. A note of humility and a beautiful nod to Lincoln:

While I'm proud of what we've achieved together, I'm far more mindful of my own failings, knowing exactly what Lincoln meant when he said, "I have been driven to my knees many times by the overwhelming conviction that I had no place else to go."

10.57 pm. "Only you have the power to move us forward." And this concrete and rooted speech is gaining rhetorical flight. It has been shrewdly constructed.

10.55 pm. The best way to defuse the leadership cult is to throw the leadership back to the people. You are the ones we've been waiting for. And "You did that" is a nice retort to "You didn't build that."

10.54 pm. Great line:

A freedom which only asks what's in it for me, a freedom without a commitment to others, a freedom without love or charity or duty or patriotism, is unworthy of our founding ideals, and those who died in their defense.

10.51 pm. Now the rebuttal of the insane GOP attacks on his alleged hatred of success. And a word – citizenship. Yes, that concept was absent from the GOP convention.

10.47 pm. Now the debt. Thank God. And he's gaining momentum. And he says that he'd be willing to sign a Bowles-Simpson-style budget deal – but the Republicans insist on tax cuts for millionaires. He's on a roll now. That was what I hoped he'd say – and he did.

10.46 pm. Frankie nails it:

Screen shot 2012-09-06 at 10.54.19 PM

10.41 pm. He certainly feels passionate about education. I'm puzzled by the speech so far – many fewer attacks on the opposition than I expected. But it's obviously designed to look forward, a delicate balance between acknowledging current pain while projecting confidence about the future. But so far, this is not his best. It's a pudding with a theme that hasn't quite gelled yet. Maybe it will.

10.37 pm. This feels like a State of the Union – not a convention rallying cry.

10.33 pm. Ridiculing the tax-cut solution to any problem was effective. But the core argument is that he has a plan – a harder plan that is not all government action – that is more than a rehash of Reaganomics three decades too late. But notice that this speech is far from the rhetorical flights of fancy of the past. It's more sober; it's more detailed.

10.30 pm. There's almost as much nostalgia in this speech as there was in Romney's. But it's a sober and slow start.

10.28 pm. A dry joke about being sick of hearing him "approve this message." Then a quick pivot to the choice election he wanted and has now gotten.

10.15 pm. Finally, a moral defense of health insurance reform. "He took the harder and more honorable path" on fighting al Qaeda, says Clinton. And the theme is about stoicism, grit, patriotism. It's a riposte to the "corporations are people" meme. People are people, the message seems to be – but Romney simply cannot understand that because he is so wrapped up in the "Bain way."

10.12 pm. This photograph of Gabby Giffords being hugged backstage by her husband, Mark Kelly, says more than words can:

151383951

By Kevork Djansezian of Getty.

10.10 pm. I'm still reeling from the juxtaposition of Dick Durbin and Prince.

10.08 pm. The ad-libbing was classic Biden; the Irish passion at times reminsicent of a Kennedy. But it was also strange; it ebbed and flowed; it digressed into vagueness and then snapped back into a clarion call. As a speech it was wanting. As a way to remind white ethnic voters why many of them voted for a mixed race community organizer, it was well-crafted.

10.06 pm. Biden catches himself – and me – in the emotion of remembering the fallen in war.

10.02 pm. Then a tub-thumping defense of American exceptionalism. This speech is designed precisely for those Reagan Democrats and wavering Independents, especially men, who want their politics with testosterone. A good line: "private sector, not the privileged sector."

9.59 pm. "What he doesn't understand …" That's the attack on Romney: a nice guy who simply cannot get what it is to be middle class.

9.58 pm. The Onion reports:

Accepting his renomination at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden countered recent Republican criticisms by asserting that most Americans were indeed better off than they were four years ago, but he acknowledged that life still paled in comparison to that one “killer fucking” summer in 1987.

9.56 pm. He's drifting a little now. Only Clinton can ad lib the way Biden is trying to.

9.49 pm. Biden is the best man to deliver the Osama bin Laden message and his smart description of it as the healing of a deep wound. He also importantly noted how the raid was presaged in the debates and had been Obama's policy before the election as well. I didn't think I'd hear a Democratic vice-president attacking the Republican nominee for not being willing to move heaven and earth to kill one mass murderer.

9.46 pm. Biden isn't tackling Romney aggressively. This is a speech to independents – and a smart retort to the Romney message that Obama "doesn't understand" the economy. What he's saying is that Romney "doesn't understand" the middle class.

9.42 pm. I guess that foreign policy lecture is on hold. But we're back to the auto-bailout. The strategy of the speech is pretty obvious: he's offering a personal testimonial to Obama's concern for the white working classes. This is about rallying that white vote a little.

9.37 pm. Biden is feeling the middle class's pain right now. There's a not-so-subtle implication that Biden and Obama have had to face tough times in their earlier years in ways that Mitt Romney didn't. But there's also an appeal to men here, white working class men, for whom employment is indeed more than money.

9.36 pm. The atmosphere has suddenly become quiet and intense. I just wish Joe Biden knew what "enormity" means.

9.34 pm. Notice how Biden is actually not talking about himself. Which is a rarity. This is about Obama and his character and his record. And he's absolutely right to take us back to what Obama faced in early 2009: an economic emergency unlike any since the 1930s. The crowd is silent.

9.31 pm. After all these years, the hair plugs are slowly surrendering to reality.

9.28 pm. I'm with Bernstein on this:

[I]f the Democrats asked me, my advice for the Joe Biden speech would be to have a foreign policy focus, and go as substantive and wonkish as possible — bookending the Clinton focus on mostly domestic policy, and contrasting with the Republican ticket's historic lack of foreign policy and national security credentials.

9.25 pm. A photograph (by Getty's Joe Raedle) that would not appear at the GOP convention, especially not involving a congressman and his spouse:

151373859

9.23 pm. The Joe Biden video is pure Americana. On the middle class: "They're not looking for a hand-out; they're looking for a shot."

9.20 pm. A late start. And the interwebs are still buzzing about the Jennifer Granholm meltdown which appeared to be her own Howard Dean moment. Money clip:

(Photo of Obama by Justin Sullivan/Getty)

What Obama Must Accomplish Tonight

Michael Scherer believes that Obama "needs to paint a vision of a post-crisis, post-dysfunction Obama presidency"

[A] repeat of his stump speech will not be enough. Thursday marks the one chance for a big speech to share with the country his vision of what will happen if he wins a second term, to define Forward as more than just a slogan. His own grade for himself is incomplete, and his strategists are all too aware that many Americans have lost sight, and faith, in his ability to complete the job. Now is his chance to tell the American people what they are voting for, not just what they are voting against. 

Noah Millman provides Obama an agenda.

Yes He Can, Ctd

A reader doesn't think my recommendation for Obama will fly:

He can and he will, but not by swearing allegiance to Simpson-Bowles in his acceptance speech. I'd bet 80% of Americans have no idea what Simpson-Bowles is and it's far too complicated to explain in a speech that's supposed to inspire voters. Do you really believe the average American will sit still even for three minutes of talking about the tax code? People want to know what's going to create jobs and make them feel more economically secure. A plan cooked up by Congress that features large helpings of pain for the middle class (like eliminating the mortgage deduction) will sound like exactly the opposite to them.

I truly believe Obama plans, if he's re-elected, to make a real effort to reduce our long-term debt. But except for a tiny sliver of voters like you, that goal doesn't resonate with the country. It would be Eastwoodian political malpractice for Obama to use his acceptance speech to tell the country it'll have to take some very bitter medicine if he's re-elected.

Another is on the same page:

As much as I agree with you that we need Simpson Bowles style reform, and that Obama would go a long way to showing his seriousness as a leader, I don't think it helps him politically.

It wins over people like you and I. People obsessed with the ins and outs of policy and politics on a daily basis. Do you think that Obama can realistically utter the words "Second Stimulus" and win re-election? Have you looked at Simpson Bowles lately? It alters Social Security, Medicare, leaves the public option on the table, cuts money for students, from the military, etc. That kind of balanced approach is definitely what we need, but judging from the Republicans Medicare attacks, would they not bombard him with each of those cuts? Suddenly Obama wants to cut things that lots of people care about.

I hope you are just trying to help nudge the campaign in that direction and not really putting your hopes into this. I don't want to read you getting all butt-hurt about this when the chances of him actually mentioning Simpson-Bowles are next to none.

This reader has the right idea:

Outflanking Romney/Ryan on deficit reduction would instantly destroy the GOP’s narrative of Obama as the big-spending lubrul hell bent on growing the federal government and driving our country into bankruptcy. It would reframe the home stretch of the election on Obama’s terms, casting him as the practical and sensible politician some of us already know him to be, while reigniting the passion of those who desperately seek a leader to compromise on reasonable grounds for the sake of moving our nation forward.

Obama taking a stand on deficit reduction a la Bowles-Simpson would fly in the face of almost everything the unhinged Right has been screaming since 2009. I think it would be another such transformative moment for many – maybe for the country. Those willing to face the mirror would realize the White House has been occupied for the last four years by a true centrist, and a president who deserves the support of the American people and a second term to finish the noble work he has begun.

My related thoughts from earlier today here.

(Video is from December 2011)